Submit your email address to the form below if you want a single email to be sent to you when Project ROL returns from its hiatus state. After those emails are sent, this address list will be deleted and never used again. If Project ROL does not return from its hiatus state, the list will never be used.
Submit your email address to the form below if you want a single email to be sent to you when Project ROL returns from its hiatus state. After those emails are sent, this address list will be deleted and never used again. If Project ROL does not return from its hiatus state, the list will never be used.
| by rikkan @ 19 June 2007 10:37 am |
| i think the word you were looking for was "bonding" but it sounds good either way. |
| by pretty_blossom @ 19 June 2007 11:52 am |
| sounds unique when it's not exactly a new word but an old one revamped. U can say it's not regular binding or bonding but something on another level - totally new to humanity so it needs a new word. Just keep it consistant - if somebody starts using a different word, have someone else correct them and explain - this is not the same as the old one. |
| by Matt V. 3.0 @ 19 June 2007 04:01 pm |
| You sure it's not supposed to be "Bonded with" instead of "Bounded with"? |
| by Loki Fenrisulf @ 19 June 2007 07:21 pm |
| why not just "linked"? Bounded sounds like they would become one person at all, like fusion in dragon ball Z, and binded souns like they would be tied with a rope...
Qell, at least for me... |
| by Ameides @ 20 June 2007 00:32 am |
| I think it just sounds weird at first because 'bound' is already in past tense, its the '-ed' version of bind. Adding an '-ed' suffix onto something that doesnt naturall have one just feels a little off. Hehe, in computer tech the other day, some girl came in with a bag of vegetables she grew in horticulture. Somebody asked 'did you grow them?' and she said 'Yeah, I growed them' 'No, you GREW them!' 'Thats what I said, I growed them!'... There was about ten minutes of grew/growed until both sides gave up.
You said earlier that neurosynchronization was a long word. How about 'N-sych' for short? or is it too much like that band...? |
| by Jason @ 20 June 2007 01:19 am |
| Well, I ended up changing it to "binded". The more I look at it the more uncomfortable I became, so I just gave in and edited the word. I checked my notes and found that "binded" was my original word anyway. I don't know what pushed me to use "bound"... |
| by Loki Fenrisulf @ 20 June 2007 02:50 pm |
| Now, I don't speak English so I may be REALLY wrong, but if what Ameides said is right (remember before screaming bad things at me Ameides, I don't know, my language isn't english) then the word isn't either bounded or binded, just bound...
But I still think linked is better (maybe because I read too much Moon of Dragons (probably translated wrong), where the flying ones develop a mental link with their partner and can kinda feel what the other feels or something like that...). |
| by Jason @ 20 June 2007 02:57 pm |
| *smacks head* That's true. I was supposed to make it bonded...not binded...I can't believe I got it wrong AGAIN even after all the discussion above... I'll fix that...later -_- |
| by Jason @ 21 June 2007 10:20 am |
| Ha...I changed it again. I didn't like "bond" so I used bind AND bound (I changed the tenses of the sentence around) |
| by TNAS @ 22 June 2007 11:15 am |
| Hu? |
[RETURN TO TOP]
